
Matt Ashford....
Soap Opera Royalty

A beloved daytime veteran shares
his hopes and plans, post-Salem.
By: Dawn
The first thing you
notice while chatting with Matt Ashford is not only how classy he
can be, but mostly, how surprisingly humble he is. After all,
this actor is easily considered soap opera royalty: From his first role as
Drew Ralston on One Life to Live, to his wildly popular turn
as Days of Our Lives' Jack Deveraux, and a daytime career
that spans over two decades, Ashford is a legendary performer in
this genre. But underneath, he's proven to be just a down-to-earth
guy, a family man, and one who gracefully and enthusiastically
accepts whatever fate has in store. I hope you all enjoy this
exclusive one-on-one chat with one of soaps' most endearing (and
enduring) actors, Matt Ashford.
Enthusiasm
is the order of the day as Ashford excitedly shares his latest
career ventures. He's gone from the studio lights to the stage
lights, in his newest role as Officer Lockstock in the musical
Urinetown. "It's a really fun show," he says, "and an
opportunity for me to kind of show myself off in different ways that
I haven't been able to do in quite some time - and I'm inviting
people from the show (Days of Our Lives) to see it!" The
co-stars coming out to show their support include Jason Cook
(ex-Shawn) and Billy Warlock (Frankie). "Actors try to get out and
do other things to keep their chops up and feel connected," Ashford
continues, "And that's what I'm doing. But it's also a great, fun
show to be a part of. I'm doing the role of the narrator (Lockstock)
and he kind of runs throughout the show commenting on it and taking
part here and there... but it's funny the way it worked out." And
why is that? "I was originally doing another character but I was
kind of covering this character," the actor shares, "And then the
other person couldn't do it so I agreed to take over. And just at
that time, I found out that I was going to be leaving Days,
so I thought this is great to have something here to look forward to
at the same time. So it worked out very well."
Urinetown's
run will continue at the Matrix Theater in Los Angeles until the
first week of November, but Ashford will not be stopping there. Next
on his agenda, after a possible Days-related promotional trip
to Australia, is the film The Unlikely's, set to begin
shooting soon after. "It's a comedy about six or seven unlikely people
who get together and make a movie!" he tells me, "The character I'm
set to play is a guy I think is named Brock Chapman, one of the most
famous soap opera actors in the world." Before the irony of that can
even sink in, Ashford shares another tidbit about this particular
role. "I also play a guy that looks like him. So I also play his
look-a-like!" Ashford is hoping for a late-summer showing of The
Unlikely's and says, "The script is changing around a bit but
it's a lot of fun. Hopefully we'll have something more to show
before too long and depending on how things go, we might have a
screening some time before this time next year."
In the meantime,
another Ashford film, The Exorcism of Tina Miller, is
completed and being shopped around to the distributors. "Actually,
the people who are working on (The Unlikely's) have asked if
they might have first shot at distribution on that as well, which
would also work out for us," Ashford smiles, "We have people looking
into that."
"Everything in
Hollywood Land takes longer than people imagine," he notes, "It
really does. It takes a movie ten, twelve, fifteen years to get from
inception to actual creation. Not that this is one of those
but these things just kind of take a while." And Ashford is more
that willing to be patient. "We're kind of growing and learning, "he says of the cast and crew of The Unlikely's, "And that was
kind of a learning experience....Sometimes, just
because that's how things worked on soaps, things change so fast -
you've got to make sure that with a movie, you have a beginning, a
middle and and end. And you've got to make sure everything holds
together, otherwise you've got a real mishmash."
But daytime is a
different story and Ashford says, "The story is an on-going story,
hopefully. And so, a lot of times, things are left open and
dangling. For example, with Jack and Jennifer, we had to start to
laugh because of this mysterious "Deep Throat" voice, the whole
'chasing down the gun,' whatever it's going to turn into... you know
the character of Patrick didn't do it. So once again, whatever Jack
and Jennifer were doing had nothing to do with the story. It was
just a total side note, but it was something we were chasing down
madly. If you're watching from a greater distance, you'll go, 'These
guys never do anything! They're like the police!'"
But it was this "side note" that had Jack and Jennifer fans raving
because it was reminiscent of their historic banter and past
adventures, and viewers were thankful for the trip down memory lane.
"Absolutely, and I appreciate that," Ashford says gratefully, "We
actually had some of the writers who wrote that stuff and then moved
on to other things, I think they had a hand in that. It was really
fun and I appreciate that the show gave us a chance to do that. But
in the larger sense, I knew that we weren't going to be unearthing
anything great! Like the poor Salem PD, they work and work to do
something, and get it totally wrong, and then they leave it to the
teenagers who uncover the truth of something. That being said, it
was fun to do that stuff and a little bittersweet, because it's
like, 'Wow! This is what we've been waiting for!'" Bittersweet,
indeed, as both Ashford and co-star Missy Reeves (Jennifer) were
both soon written off the show. "It
was fortunate that we didn't just disappear quietly, as has happened
in the past," he states, matter-of-factly, "We had a chance to do
something and have a nice farewell." As for the chances of
revisiting the role of Jack, Ashford reveals, "I talked to Ken
Corday and he said, 'Well, the door's not shut, there are always
possibilities.' Nothing that I'm aware of in the short term, but my
feelings of the character of Jack, he definitely played before
Jennifer and there are plenty of ways he can be used and played
otherwise. I think I'd have more fun with him as a villain lately
than anything else. Or a quasi-villain. That's what I'd work to do.
You know, someone who creates a lot of trouble for others but you
could see his point of view too. But once again, it's not up to me.
It's up to the writers and those kinds of things....In the meantime,
I pursue other things."
Despite rumors to
the contrary, one offer that has not come Ashford's way is a return
to General Hospital as Tom Hardy. "That's just selling
magazines," he laughs, "You read the magazines, you know, there's
nothing. I mean, they're busy. They're kind of in Sonny Corrinthos
land. They'll be there for a couple of years at least! And the fact
is that it takes up a lot of their time." That's not to say that
other shows do not have room at their inns for Ashford's
considerable talents. He had the chance to audition for a touring
production of Camelot with Michael York, and ultimately
decided against it. "I was getting interested," he admits, "I was
going to audition... and I thought, 'Wait a minute. I'm going to be
out of town for the entire pilot season. Maybe I should rethink
this. This might not be good.'" Not even the tempting thought of
working with the legendary York? "Leaving house and home for the
better part of a year, you know, gone. No questions, you've got to
go?... It's my time to say, 'Well, I've got to get back in the
pool... Look, here's Matt Ashford. You haven't seen me in quite a number
of years. I've been doing this soap.' And now I'm available!"
Ironically, during
Ashford's prior leave from Days of Our Lives, another
tempting offer came along, that of serial killer Stephen Haver on
One Life to Live. His spellbinding performance drew praise from
both fans and the industry. "I didn't do anything," Matt offers, in
his adorably humble manner, "That's what's scary. I was just
speaking really quietly. People were saying, 'Oh that's so creepy!'
As we were doing this thing, 'Can I show more of this?' But
actually, the character didn't show up until all of their other
actors were already killed off too. I mean, they were all gone
except for one, I think." Admittedly, this viewer could not stop
staring and I told Ashford that the role of Haver was among some of
his finest work. "Thank you," he says, still humble, "It was a
really fun character... I would've loved to have been able to make
him a much more beloved character at the university. Bree
(Williamson; Jessica/Tess) and I wanted to make more happen, make it
so that people would have more invested. But I wasn't there very
long before the weird stuff started happening and that character was
also written to be a short-term character. They saw that I was
available and said, 'Okay, let's see what we can do here.' And they
made it worth my while, but it was still a short-term character. I
started to think that maybe it wouldn't be, but really, that's all
it was."
So what is it that
draws Ashford to the musical stage? "Well, I enjoy singing, but
there are also some fun characters," he enthuses, "You know, within
some of the things that we do, they have a little more behind them,
and I enjoy the people we work with. John Rubinstein is a good
friend who I've known for about thirteen years, and he is on this
show (Urinetown) as well." But going from soaps to stage was
not an easy task as Ashford soon found out. "Sometimes he (Rubinstein)
says, 'You're speaking too fast and running through the sentence,'
it makes it hard to understand what I'm saying," Ashford confesses,
"What is the sense of it? And I realize it's like decompressing from
working on the soaps. Sometimes I just have huge amounts of material
to go through and I'm talking so fast that you're thinking, 'Well,
if they can't understand it, maybe they'll tape it and run it
through again.' But Jack was usually trying to sell somebody some
hogwash or something and that doesn't necessarily work in a stage
play or in a musical where you have certain things that really have
to be said in a way that's understandable. You get caught up in
certain patterns and this gives me an opportunity to break it."
"I love plays too,"
he goes on to say, "But out here in Los Angeles, there's not a lot
of money in theater, so you do it for the love. Some of the plays
which have gone on, I've had to say, 'Well, I have so much time over
here, and so much time over here, I can't get out of this,' and I
couldn't take off from the show (Days) because I'd be losing
money just to go do the play. You have to take these things into
account, you know, that's the job." But theater and soaps sometimes
do mix and a perfect example is Ashford's role in the play,
Deceit, which is now available on DVD. "It's a very interesting
show," he says, "and you kind of don't know what's going on. But
for me, I think the character is more like the classic character of
Jack that I've played in years past. That was one of the reasons I
enjoyed doing it, just kind of jumping into it, was that I had a
chance to do something I hadn't done in a long time."
"I think of Jack as
having a very dark side that he covers up with humor," Ashford
observes,
of the comparison between his Deceit character and the role
which will always be a part of him, "I've always thought that. And
they tried to take that away, but the humor was always just a
sideshow, and unfortunately, became kind of a mainstay thing for my
character, which makes the character become less important and kind
of fluffy. I've always tried to use humor to kind of obscure the
darker intent underneath, Anyway, this character from Deceit...has
really harkened that back for me. So for anybody who'd love to see
some classic Jack Deveraux, and hadn't seen this, I think that
they'd truly enjoy it!"
Another topic that
Ashford is passionate about is his involvement in retinoblastoma
research, an illness that struck his younger daughter, Emma. "Thanks
to the tremendous support that we've gotten over time, hospitals
started to recognize the work that RBI is doing. And for that reason,
the proteomics, which is the basic research in finding what goes
wrong with children who have cancer that causes secondary cancers,"
he states, and hopes to have basic eye exams performed on newborns
added on as part of the standard procedure. "There's always the
secondary thing about pediatricians checking babies' eyes, which
they don't really want to do, because it always seems like so much
trouble, and that's where the children are missed when they have
something wrong with their eyes," Ashford insists, "You know,
they're either blind in one eye or worse, until later, when they
find out from the child - it's too late.... When they check babies,
they do a blood test, they check hearing, but they don't check eyes
because it seems like so much and they think there is a greater
chance of not seeing something. But there are more things being done
now."
Among the possible
new developments? A camera which can photograph a baby's eyes in a
dark room to ensure the pupils are dilated, and avoid eye drops.
"There's like a one in a million chance that somebody could be
adversely affected by eye drops, and that's what the pediatricians
are hanging on to," Ashford says, "One in 12,000 in the United
States has a chance of getting retinoblastoma and it's much higher
in third world countries or places where nutrition isn't so good.
That's where the technology is hopefully going to make it easier for
the pediatricians to do that check, because children have eyesight
trouble. Statistically, six out of ten children who drop out of
school have trouble seeing the board or hearing the teacher. So it's
very real."
"You can help
people early on, try to really kind of hook in, it might affect so
many other things in a positive way as well."
And positive is
just how Ashford feels in the face of his unexpected exit from Days,
and he tells his fans, "I really appreciate all the support they
have given. I'm always saying, 'Hang in there, hang in there,' and
this kind of came along. I'm sorry if anyone feels like they've been
hoodwinked, or I don't know what the right term is."
But "hoodwinked"
may very well sum up the sentiments of most of the fans, and Ashford
reflects, "When some of these forces come crashing down, we're just like
employees in the factory. And I don't blame anybody for
sending Jack off when the character of Jennifer goes. If I'd been a
producer, I would've looked at me as well. It's just unfortunate,
but I'm not a main character who has one of the main names on the
show, as much as I'd like to think that." Before I can interject
with my gushing argument to the contrary, he goes on to say, "I
can't fault any of the producers. They're trying to save a quarter
of a million dollars a week from the budget, which is impacting
everybody across the board.... At this point, I've been seen mainly
as the opposite pairing of Jennifer. But if they can get that out of
their heads and maybe see me in another way, who knows, because I
can play any number of things. That's really up to those powers."
"I feel that if
hadn't had this support, I would've been gone sometime shortly after 2000,"
Ashford admits, "People continued to be very supportive of me and my
character, and of me and Missy, and kind of kept us around. I just
think that they recognized that we had some kind of inherent value,
and part of that is because of the support from all the wonderful
fans of mine and Missy's, and I really appreciate that."
Still, his exit
came as a big surprise to his co-stars. "When I told Stephen
(Nichols; Steve) he just kind of stared at me," the actor states, "I
was like, 'What were they thinking?' because it's not good for him
either. It's not good for him or Mary Beth (Evans; Kayla). I was
looking forward to having this other family member there and he's
kind of in that same boat." But Ashford, as a daytime veteran, is
also seeing many changes on the horizon for both soaps and
television in general as well. "Everyone has their own ideas about
what's going to make these shows go, and the fact is, the only that
that's really going to make these shows go are the fans watching. If
people aren't watching, then all they can do is hold on to a
continually shrinking piece of pie, or a perceived piece of pie,
because I do think people are watching in the evenings, or on TiVo,
or recording."
"Almost any show on
nighttime has been turned into a soap," he marvels, citing
Grey's Anatomy and House as examples, "They (the prime
time shows) have to go to making things up and that's what daytime
has been doing for years. So people can get their fix at night with
a night time show that is conceivably better written and in many
cases, much better acted, because they've had the time to work on
the quality of those moments and getting those things just right,
whereas daytime has to kind of churn out ninety to a hundred pages a
day with people who are sometimes just first-time actors, or people
who haven't had a chance to really take a swing at at. People
are, I think, getting their serialized fix, their soap-type fix from
that kind of stuff, because everything has gone that way..... But
that doesn't necessarily bode well for daytime, especially if th e
people feel like, 'Well, I'm watching my nighttime soap.'... It just
makes it hard for daytime and people trying to hold on to a daytime
audience, because we have to ask, 'What is it about daytime that
makes it worth watching? Why do they tune in when they can suddenly
see ER, or Grey's Anatomy, or House, or any
number of tings suddenly five times a week when they go into their
syndication?' There's only so much time that people have."
"The real tough
questions are, 'What do these daytime shows have to offer?' And
hopefully that's being answered by the powers-that-be."
Still, he has high
hopes for Days of Our Lives, and the recent installment of Hogan
Sheffer as the new head writer. "It was a little bit of sad irony
for me, because we get this guy that's coming in and he's going to
start writing character stuff, and that's when I had to leave,"
Ashford sighs, "That's just the way it goes, and I really hope that
they're going to start writing really great character-driven stuff
for these actors to give them their chance... So, because I left,
the show's really going to get a chance to bump up. My friends who
are working on the show are going to get a chance to really do
something."
As for his co-star
Reeves, and her choice to leave the role of Jennifer, Ashford says,
"She is really doing the mother thing. That's what she wanted to do,
that's what she said, and she really meant it. She's been offered a
number of things down there (Tennessee) and she's turned them
down.... She wants to be there with her kids.... I think she just
kind of realized that the writing was on the wall and it was time to
move on. So she started making those plans, and that was quite a
long time ago. She just said, "This is done. They're not really
writing for us anymore, so it's time to look to my family.' And
that's what she's doing."
"Things happen for
a reason, and hopefully I'll bring a breath of fresh air to the
folks on Days and a breath of fresh air to myself as well."
All photos by JPI Studios, ABC and NBC.
|